Workforce health as a managed cost line, not a growing one.

Prevention, personal health and injury care on one governed platform, measured against the claims line you already own. Workforce health without the handovers.

Your workforce health spend is not one line. It is an EAP, a wellbeing platform, a handful of ad hoc providers and an injury process, and nobody owns the total.

The wellbeing portion reports engagement, not return. The claims portion reports cost, but only after the cost is incurred. Between them sits the part that actually moves the number, and it has no owner.

Premiums climb regardless. In New South Wales, scheme claims costs reached $6.2 billion in 2024-25 against $4.6 billion in 2021-22, with premiums up around 8 per cent a year for three years.

It is not a discretionary spend problem. It is an unmanaged liability.

Which line on your P&L moves if the wellbeing or preventative health programme works?

Around 15%

less spent on treatment per claim, because workers need fewer appointments to recover

One accountable line

Fragmented vendor spend consolidates into a single governed service with defined SLAs and one reporting view.

Spend that converts

100 percent of wellbeing funding converts into delivered clinical care through the credits model, not licences and log-ins.

Measured where it lands

The model is measured on claims cost, duration and time to treatment, not engagement metrics.

Common questions

Is this new spend?

No. It replaces spend rather than adding to it, and it is the only part of the stack measured against the claims line you already own.

How is it measured?

On claims cost, claim duration and time to treatment, against your own baseline rather than a case study.